Alex S ([info]barrysarll) wrote,
@ 2009-07-02 11:22:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: optimistic
Current music:Surf's Up - The Beach Boys

More cunning even than I intended
Visited Kew Gardens for the first time yesterday, and it's magical. For somewhere so popular, it still doesn't feel crowded; for somehere so labelled, it doesn't feel lifeless. I suppose it's a combination of two of my favourite things, a mad old-style library manifest as a country house garden. Plus, dragonflies! The day before I'd been worrying that I'd yet to see any this year, but clearly that's because they're all getting busy down in Kew.
We also saw some guinea fowl. Even speaking as a vegetarian of nearly two decades, their combination of unflappability and fat-assedness screamed 'lunch'.
Then on to see the magnificent Philip Jeays, chanson supergroup in tow, launch his new album (and yes, I'm going to keep linking to him whenever the subject arises until you all become fans, buy his albums and send him straight in at Number One). The Jeays Battersea Barge shows are the social event of the season, but that season is early December; I have seen him here at other times of year before, but not for bloody ages. The usual supports make jokes about this, and it turns out that last December, when I thought the Speech Painter was maybe improving, I was just overwhelmed by red wine and christmas spirit; his presence is once more justified only by the extra piquancy he gives 'Geoff', Phil's song about shagging the Speech Painter's wife. We expect the new album set to be followed by a hits encore, but in spite of finishing early, there are only three old tracks. Stranger still, the new album doesn't include 'Thank You British Airways' - but then, 'Mr Jeays' was being played two albums before it was released. The new stuff is, however, brilliant - and he seems to be playing to his strengths, with fewer 'war is stupid' songs than ever, more lovelorn and timeworn heartbreakers. Thank you, Mr Jeays.

For the first time since he died, yesterday I deliberately listened to a Michael Jackson track. Not one of the ones blaring out of every car and shop, but the last one I remember having any interest in, before it became clear how wrong he'd gone: 'Scream'. And it's a bloody mess. In his paranoia, you can tell he's almost approaching that wonderfully dehumanised sound R&B revelled in around the late nineties and early noughties, but perfectionism and endless second-guessing just leaves it clattering and confused. Shame. For a happier Youtube experience, I recommend Nathan Fillion from Firefly as Green Lantern; alas, this is a fan-made trailer for a film that does not exist but still, how good does it look? That was from the mailout of one of the UK's best comics shops, Page 45; the other, Gosh, also alerted me to a gem: Comics creator stopped by Transportation Security Administration for carrying script about writer under suspicion by Transportation Security Administration.

Read Poul Anderson's Brainwave on Tuesday - a novel in which the Earth exits the intelligence-dampening field in which it's been stuck for millennia, and everybody suddenly gets a lot smarter. Reading it in the park at least served to keep me posted that no, this was not really happening, but it's still an astonishing book - and one with which I especially sympathise in weather like this, because I can feel the heat making me dumber. It's from four years before Flowers for Algernon, and while I've never read that (science fiction which gets mainstream critical acclaim usually leaves me suspicious), I've read enough things which riff on it to suspect that it got a lot of inspiration here. Poul Anderson is a weird one - my dad is a fan, so realistically I must have read some of his stuff as a kid, but I have no idea what. The only one I could tell you for sure is The Broken Sword, an impressively bleak fantasy novel he wrote before fantasy became entirely codified, set in the real Middle Ages (complete with all the stuff people then knew about but we tend to ignore) rather than an analogue, which always gets me on side. This...this has almost nothing in common with that, except a certain majestic clarity of vision. It's not flawless; it does at times feel like the cosmic vision of Olaf Stapledon forced into a format which looks something a little more like a novel, and suffering accordingly (Anderson's evolved humans, for instance, still all seem to be locked into heterosexual monogamy - because he was more stuck in his ways than Stapledon 20 years earlier, or just because he had less space?). And the idea that the superbrains of future Man find no consolation or worth in any of the species' past achievements...well, I'm as contemptuous of humanity as the next person who'd gladly sell us out to the first civilised species that made contact, but I don't buy that. Anderson's brain-boosted humans abandon TV for magazines, then magazines for books; after the change, one simpleton thinks 'I can read a comic book. Maybe I can read a real book now.' Well, as someone who can happily go from Ulysses to Mighty Avengers, and always hated John Stuart Mill's spurious distinction betweem 'higher' and 'lower' pleasures, you can guess how I feel about that. In the end, the advanced humans become something not unlike Iain Banks' Culture - just a bit less fun. But still, that's an awful lot to fit in 160 pages. Plus, you know that thing from...Mickey Spillane, maybe? 'Whenever I don't know what happens next, a guy comes through the door with a gun?' Poul Anderson goes one better. One chapter ends when a chimp comes in with a gun. On an elephant.




(26 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]amuchmoreexotic
2009-07-02 10:30 am UTC (link)
There's a Bruce Sterling short about an intelligence-boosting virus which involves sentient racoons. I think it was quite good.

Have you read Vernor Vinge's novels which also use the idea of the intelligence-damping field, in this case ordered as Zones which allow less and less intelligence as you approach the centre of the galaxy (and also seem to prevent FTL travel as you get deeper in)? A Fire Upon The Deep and A Deepness In The Sky. Both amazing.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]barrysarll
2009-07-02 10:36 am UTC (link)
No, I keep meaning to get round to Vinge but have yet to do so. Sterling is another gap, I've read a few shorts (but not that one) and I suppose he did half The Difference Engine. Although, one of the shorts I did like was also about intelligence - specifically the idea that it was not in itself any guarantee of advancement in the universe, and could often be counterproductive or at best temporarily useful. Called 'Swarm' iirc.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]amuchmoreexotic
2009-07-02 10:39 am UTC (link)
Is that one of the Mechanists vs Shapers stories?

Blindsight by Peter Watts [full text here], explores a similar idea, and is fucking amazing.

Edited at 2009-07-02 10:41 am UTC

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]barrysarll
2009-07-02 10:42 am UTC (link)
I got a hardcopy of that from your clearout, thanks!

And yes, it's Mechanists vs Shapers, but the only one of them I've read. Did see an anthology once in a charity shop which I nearly bought, but it was a bit dear and while half of it was that, half was Bruce Sterling Does Fantasy, something I suspect my life is complete without.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]pippaalice
2009-07-02 10:42 am UTC (link)
I hope you did not eat the fat bottomed guinea fowl. Poor things. Also SB and I saw dragonflys before you turned up in Ilford.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]barrysarll
2009-07-02 10:43 am UTC (link)
OK, so long as they are not *all* in Kew. No, I had taken sandwiches so did not need to eat guinea fowl. But you know how South Pacific had all that stuff about island creatures who really cannot cope with predators? These guys were the poster boys for that.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]pippaalice
2009-07-02 10:46 am UTC (link)
Aww. BTW did you see the giant NZ birds that cannot fly and lumber around. I love them. They are like me in bird form. I bet they fall down holes too.

You could have added the bird to your sandwich. Om nomnom.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]barrysarll
2009-07-02 10:48 am UTC (link)
You appear to be conflicted over whether the birds should be eaten!

Yes, they were cute but I still think of your bird form as *bounce!*

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]pippaalice
2009-07-02 11:17 am UTC (link)
I am. I think if they have cute fat bottoms then eating them is bad but also amusing. CONFLICT!

Heh! This bird is not only bouncy but doing a sechs dance, so not entirely unlike me. :P

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]barrysarll
2009-07-02 11:18 am UTC (link)
Filth!

There were three, so maybe you could compromise and just eat one?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]pippaalice
2009-07-02 11:37 am UTC (link)
omnomnom

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]puzzled_anwen
2009-07-02 01:23 pm UTC (link)
I think the best plan is what Alex said re: just eat one, then you can still laugh at the others and their cute bums. Yay bums!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]pippaalice
2009-07-02 01:33 pm UTC (link)
bums are good aren't they? :D

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]atommickbrane
2009-07-02 10:54 am UTC (link)
Q: where can I go to see fireflies? proper ones, not that telly programme that I've never seen...

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]barrysarll
2009-07-02 11:03 am UTC (link)
You totally should watch the programme too, though! You like Joss Whedon, after all.

Do we have fireflies in the UK? I do not recall ever seeing any. I know Neil Gaiman has them at his house in the American Midwest, if that helps at all.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]bluedevi
2009-07-02 11:08 am UTC (link)
Anderson's evolved humans, for instance, still all seem to be locked into heterosexual monogamy

We're rewatching Star Trek TNG at the moment, for the teenage nostalgia, and there was an episode that was all - spoilers are hardly relevant for a show from the 90s, right? - "oh yeah I've loved you for twenty years, but you were my best friend's wife so I could never say anything, and then after he died I could still never say anything because it would have felt like betraying my best friend". Which feels really jarring when you've just come from reading a Culture novel.

I wonder if in some future society that sort of thing will seem just as comically out-of-place as Asimov characters in stories from the 50s who are doing the whole man-in-armchair-watching-baseball/woman-in-apron-making-cookies thing, IN SPACE.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]barrysarll
2009-07-02 11:16 am UTC (link)
Yes! Or the technological equivalent, where someone gets off the rocketplane from Pluto and then goes looking for a stationary pay(vid)phone. That said, I dread to think what interplanetary roaming fees would be like.

TNG's social attitudes are possibly even funnier than the original series', precisely because they were trying so hard to be sensitive and modern, and failing so badly and so often.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]bluedevi
2009-07-02 11:38 am UTC (link)
Oh lord, do you remember the Gay Allegory Episode? The one with the person from a one-sex planet who fell in lust with Riker? I was astonishingly naïve as a teenager and even then it was painful.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]barrysarll
2009-07-02 11:41 am UTC (link)
I was discussing it with [info]xandratheblue yesterday, as it happens. Part of me would almost like to see it again just to see if it's even worse than I remember; I strongly suspect it is.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]monkeyssk8
2009-07-02 11:38 am UTC (link)
I love fowl, but I'm back on the vegetarian train, except I eat fish. I find it harder to resist prawns than wee birds.

Did you sweat it out in the sections of Kew Gardens with the exotic plants and flowers. It kinda feels like you've been made love to by a garden.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]barrysarll
2009-07-02 11:51 am UTC (link)
Some of it was pretty down'n'dirty, yeah. Especially the walk around the top of the palm house, during which I thought I might expire of tropical steaminess. On the upside, walking out of there made the outside feel almost breezy by comparison!

I never much liked the taste of fish, so there was never any likelihood of my going for the halfway house when I went veggie.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]puzzled_anwen
2009-07-02 01:27 pm UTC (link)
I once tried to pass myself off as not eating fish from a moral highground thingo but unfortunately if you still eat tasty tasty meat noone believes you...

My brother has a card in the style of a M:TG type game card with a carrot on it and one of its features is "suitable for vegetarians" and then on the other side is a fish and it says "not suitable for vegetarians", only it's better than that because someone actually made it funny instead of me just not being able to remember it properly.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]barrysarll
2009-07-02 02:55 pm UTC (link)
One friend of mine has suggested, and I take his point, that morally fish is worse, because unlike most meat or fowl, it would generally still be alive (and usually in greater numbers) even if humans weren't chowing down on it.

You are, however, right about bums, above.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]drummygirl
2009-07-02 11:55 am UTC (link)
Flowers for A. is actually good though.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]barrysarll
2009-07-02 12:00 pm UTC (link)
It's certainly not inconceivable that I might one day read it, but it's not on the (nebulous and largely metaphorical) List. Which itself just took a hit with the arrival of a book on the Thirty Years War that I expected to be about 400 pages long and is in fact 850, plus notes.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]returntosender
2009-07-02 01:10 pm UTC (link)
Kew is amazing, I'm glad you enjoyed it!

(Reply to this)


(26 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…